@property - take it behind the woodshed and shoot it?

[Nick Sabalausky]

On Thu, 24 Jan 2013 22:52:05 +0100
"Jonathan M Davis" <jmdavisProg at gmx.com> wrote:
> 
> And we can (and should) implement @property in a way that deals with 
> properties properly regardless of what we do with parenless function
> calls.
> 

I should clarify that this is my view as well. I may be vocally opposed
to optional-parens for function calls, but even I'll admit that *is* a
much lesser issue than making sure @property stays and is implemented
properly.