@property - take it behind the woodshed and shoot it?

[Andrei Alexandrescu]

On 1/24/13 9:11 PM, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
> I believe that that's what we have now. The problem is when you want a
> property which returns a delegate. And for that, we need @property. Getting
> rid of @property makes it a problem, whereas with @property, it can work - as
> can property functions which return delegates.

Well how about we just renounce those for the sake of simplification.

Andrei