@property - take it behind the woodshed and shoot it?

[mist]

On Friday, 25 January 2013 at 13:18:47 UTC, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
> On 2013-01-25 10:16, deadalnix wrote:
>
>> Assignation is right associative, so it is equivalent to :
>> auto i = (f = 3);
>>
>> The setter is called.
>
> That's what I'm saying, the setter needs to be able to return 
> something and not just void.

Hm, shouldn't it be processed like that:
1) evaluate "f = 3", setter called
2) evaluate "(f = 3)" -> evaluate "f" -> getter called
3) evaluate "auto i = ", setter called
?