@property - take it behind the woodshed and shoot it?

[Rob T]

On Friday, 25 January 2013 at 22:39:07 UTC, Jonathan M Davis 
wrote:
> On Friday, January 25, 2013 23:23:50 mist wrote:
>> On Friday, 25 January 2013 at 22:15:51 UTC, Jonathan M Davis
>> 
>> wrote:
>> > They both already work and have do so for ages.
>> > 
>> > - Jonathan M Davis
>> 
>> Erm? Yes, and thus it was an answer to "you need to mess every
>> function declaration with an annotation"
>
> I know. I was responding to Rob's post which implied that the 
> syntax you gave
> didn't currently work.
>
> - Jonathan M Davis

I misread the post by mist, I incorrectly thought that it was a 
new syntax proposal as I did not know about @property:.

--rt