auto ref - again

[deadalnix]

On Saturday, 26 January 2013 at 16:27:04 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu 
wrote:
> On 1/26/13 6:03 AM, Namespace wrote:
>> In relation to this post:
>> http://forum.dlang.org/thread/ssiulznvtkmfkimmatpk@forum.dlang.org?page=5#post-knnghuzbzqddaqcjtvch:40forum.dlang.org
>>
>> I hereby open up again the discussion about auto ref.
>> There are only some questions: Will auto ref be implemented in 
>> the near
>> future or not?
>
> Yes. We are actively looking into a complete solution. Along 
> the way we also very strongly want to define semantics of "ref" 
> in such a way that makes unsafe escapes impossible. These two 
> features are related.
>

Wouldn't it be nice if such thing would be settled BEFORE 
breaking quite a lot of code when changing this behavior in 2.061 
?