Fixing module-scope private

mist none at none.none
Sat Jan 26 14:23:04 PST 2013


There was discussion recently about unpleasant name conflict 
possible with private module symbols. I have just encountered a 
sarcastically false statement on dlang.org : "Private module 
members are equivalent to static declarations in C programs."

Made me sad and wondering: was there any DIP after that thread or 
it has ended, as it often happens, with a decision to "plan 
carefully"? In latter case I may try to write one.


More information about the Digitalmars-d mailing list