Fixing module-scope private

[deadalnix]

On Saturday, 26 January 2013 at 22:23:05 UTC, mist wrote:
> There was discussion recently about unpleasant name conflict 
> possible with private module symbols. I have just encountered a 
> sarcastically false statement on dlang.org : "Private module 
> members are equivalent to static declarations in C programs."
>
> Made me sad and wondering: was there any DIP after that thread 
> or it has ended, as it often happens, with a decision to "plan 
> carefully"? In latter case I may try to write one.

Can you explain what is broken ?