Fixing module-scope private

[Timon Gehr]

On 01/27/2013 01:25 PM, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
> On 1/26/13 6:13 PM, Peter Alexander wrote:
>> On Saturday, 26 January 2013 at 22:23:05 UTC, mist wrote:
>>> Made me sad and wondering: was there any DIP after that thread or it
>>> has ended, as it often happens, with a decision to "plan carefully"?
>>
>> I *think* Walter is still against changing it, on the grounds that it
>> would make module-level private different from any other type of private.
>
> Walter and I believe it is necessary to define module private in a way
> that makes the symbol impossible to leak. Work on a detailed DIP would
> be definitely welcome. Walter enumerated a few concerns that the DIP
> should address in a message. What was the title of the past discussion?
>
> Andrei

http://forum.dlang.org/post/kb86il$1u9v$1@digitalmars.com