About Go, D module naming

[deadalnix]

On Monday, 24 December 2012 at 15:36:47 UTC, Jonathan M Davis 
wrote:
> I believe that C# did something similar. It would certainly 
> solve the question
> of package's virtuality quite nicely and wouldn't change any 
> existing code,
> just allow for those who want virtual package functions to have 
> them.
>

Stopping to conflate visibility with virtuality would solve it in 
a more simple way.