Inconsistency in CPU version symbols

[Iain Buclaw]

On 27 January 2013 17:17, Johannes Pfau <nospam at example.com> wrote:

> Am Sun, 27 Jan 2013 16:14:19 +0000
> schrieb Iain Buclaw <ibuclaw at ubuntu.com>:
>
> > >
> > > Are Thumb1 systems still relevant today? I'm not too familiar with
> > > Thumb,
> > so forgive my ignorance here. If we still do need to care about
> > Thumb1, then OK.
> > >
> > >
> >
> > I seem to recall thumb being mostly 16bit systems.
>
> Really? AFAIK ARM has always been 32bit or more. Thumb only limits
> instruction size to 16bit, the registers are still 32bit.
>


Learn something new every day. :)

-- 
Iain Buclaw

*(p < e ? p++ : p) = (c & 0x0f) + '0';
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.puremagic.com/pipermail/digitalmars-d/attachments/20130127/0cbc39ec/attachment.html>