Property discussion wrap-up

[deadalnix]

On Monday, 28 January 2013 at 04:40:34 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu 
wrote:
> To get the address of a function's result: &fun().
>

That is kind of the point, fun is equivalent to fun(), but &fun 
is not equivalent to &fun(), not equivalent to (&fun)(), which is 
weird.

> I'm not convinced that's a bad thing. I've come to realize 
> functions and variables _are_ different.
>

Can you elaborate on that ?