Property discussion wrap-up

[deadalnix]

On Monday, 28 January 2013 at 15:44:28 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu 
wrote:
>> Phobos is kind of fucked up in this regard.
>
> I understand how you feel though you probably are overstating 
> it. No language can please everyone, and nobody will be pleased 
> by all aspects of a language.
>

Yes that is probably overstated. But please consider that this 
state of thing in phobos comes from the lax property enforcement 
in the first place, which mitigate greatly your argument about 
phobos codebase.