Possible @property compromise

deadalnix deadalnix at gmail.com
Tue Jan 29 21:23:47 PST 2013


On Wednesday, 30 January 2013 at 05:07:15 UTC, Jonathan M Davis 
wrote:
> On Wednesday, January 30, 2013 05:57:14 Jesse Phillips wrote:
>> It seems at least some members for @property feel that 
>> currently
>> functions are being annotated with @property that shouldn't be.
>
> The prime example of that would be save.
>
> - Jonathan M Davis

rehash, dup, length (as a setter), the list goes on and on.


More information about the Digitalmars-d mailing list