Possible @property compromise
deadalnix
deadalnix at gmail.com
Tue Jan 29 21:23:47 PST 2013
On Wednesday, 30 January 2013 at 05:07:15 UTC, Jonathan M Davis
wrote:
> On Wednesday, January 30, 2013 05:57:14 Jesse Phillips wrote:
>> It seems at least some members for @property feel that
>> currently
>> functions are being annotated with @property that shouldn't be.
>
> The prime example of that would be save.
>
> - Jonathan M Davis
rehash, dup, length (as a setter), the list goes on and on.
More information about the Digitalmars-d
mailing list