Possible @property compromise

[Zach the Mystic]

On Thursday, 31 January 2013 at 01:26:19 UTC, Steven 
Schveighoffer wrote:
> The compromise is: OK, you want to ditch @property?  I can live 
> with that as long as we have some way to designate properties.  
> How about this?

It's only natural that a person wants to advocate for his or her 
own proposal. That having been said, can I interest you in mine? 
:-)

http://forum.dlang.org/thread/kdukid$stg$1@digitalmars.com?page=2#post-yqvrjszzlcpmmuyqyxdz:40forum.dlang.org

That a long link. Here's a shorter one if it doesn't work (my 
experience with these forums is limited, sometimes the line gets 
truncated wrongly):
http://forum.dlang.org/thread/kdukid$stg$1@digitalmars.com?page=2

If it fails to solve any of your problems, perhaps you could tell 
me how or why. It is necessary to read the whole discussion to 
get insight on how the proposal is developing. Also note that the 
top proposal is not directly related to the @property discussion, 
so you have to skip down a few lines to get to the property part.