Possible @property compromise
Jacob Carlborg
doob at me.com
Thu Jan 31 08:31:12 PST 2013
On 2013-01-31 15:28, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
> Now we're just name calling ;) I tend to think that for the most
> successful company in the business to standardize on it is a pretty good
> testimony to it being well designed. I certainly have grown fond of it,
> there are some really nice features in it. But truly, xcode has played
> a large role in making the language seem good.
And that is thanks to Clang and LLVM. Xcode wouldn't be nearly as good
on autocompletion, refactoring and static analysis to mention a few
features.
Also it has started to catch up in later years, thinking of Objective-C
2. More recently blocks, some kind of operator overloading and more
object literals.
--
/Jacob Carlborg
More information about the Digitalmars-d
mailing list