[your code here]

Timon Gehr timon.gehr at gmx.ch
Thu Jan 31 13:08:52 PST 2013


On 01/31/2013 09:43 PM, Ali Çehreli wrote:
> On 01/31/2013 10:39 AM, Andrej Mitrovic wrote:
>  > On 1/31/13, Ali Çehreli<acehreli at yahoo.com>  wrote:
>  >> For the same reason, if it is really an Error that has been thrown,
> even
>  >> the destructors are not called during stack unwinding.
>  >
>  > Where are you extracting this information from?
>
> I hope I haven't spread wrong information. I "learned" this from the
> discussions on this forum. Perhaps it was merely an idea and I remember
> it as truth.
>
> Others, is what I said correct? Why do I think that way? :)
>
> Ali
>

Destructors are not "guaranteed" to run. They actually do. I think this 
is mostly to allow segmentation faults on Linux.


More information about the Digitalmars-d mailing list