pass-by-ref semantics for structs (was Deque impl.)
Rainer Schuetze
r.sagitario at gmx.de
Thu Jan 31 14:31:38 PST 2013
On 31.01.2013 22:37, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
> On Thu, 31 Jan 2013 15:55:11 -0500, Rainer Schuetze <r.sagitario at gmx.de>
> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>>
>>>> - how do you do reference counting when accessing shared containers in
>>>> multiple threads? Consider clearing the last reference to a shared
>>>> reference counted object while another thread reads this reference.
>>>> With usual atomic operations on the reference count only:
>>>>
>>>> 1. the reading thread reads the payload pointer
>>>> 2. the writing thread reads the payload pointer, decrements the
>>>> reference count and frees the array
>>>> 3. the reading thread increments the reference count, but accesses
>>>> the deallocated array.
>>>
>>> I would be concerned if a thread can get ahold of a reference counted
>>> pointer without having the counter incremented already on its behalf.
>>>
>>
>> You have to read the pointer to increment the counter to get hold of
>> the reference.
>
> Right, but where do you get the original pointer from? Wouldn't that
> reference have incremented the count?
>
Any reference that is accessible from multiple threads, e.g. a global
shared variable.
shared(Container) allObjects;
Without any thread having a reference to it, the payload's reference
count is 1. The reading thread above increments the counter when making
a local copy, but the writing thread decrements the counter when
assigning Container.init. If both run concurrently, with the sequence 1
to 3 above, trouble is inevitable.
More information about the Digitalmars-d
mailing list