Possible @property compromise

[Zach the Mystic]

On Friday, 1 February 2013 at 03:12:29 UTC, TommiT wrote:
> On Friday, 1 February 2013 at 02:52:42 UTC, Zach the Mystic 
> wrote:
>> I need to study this principle a little more. In other words, 
>> alias this is a templated parameter in this case? Which page 
>> is the documentation for these templated parameters, because I 
>> didn't see templates in my code.
>
> No, alias this is basically implicit cast operator that will be 
> tried if everything else fails. But writeln is a function 
> template, i.e. its parameters/arguments are templated.
>
> http://dlang.org/template.html

If what you say is true, then all the more reason to build opGet 
into the compiler...

Was I correct in saying that the template in question was 
to!string(foo.n)? Or does the problem occur in passing to 
writeln() itself?