SIMD on Windows

[Manu]

Maybe make the arrays public? it's conceivable the optimiser could
eliminate all that code, since it can prove the results are never
referenced...
I doubt that's the problem though, just a first guess.

On 2 July 2013 09:14, Jonathan Dunlap <jadit2 at gmail.com> wrote:

> Thanks Jerro, I went ahead and used a pointer reference to ensure it's
> being saved back into the array (http://dpaste.dzfl.pl/**52710926<http://dpaste.dzfl.pl/52710926>).
> Two things:
> 1) still showing zero time delta
> 2) On windows 7 x74, using a SAMPLE_AT size of 30000 or higher will cause
> the program to immediately quit with no output at all. Even the first
> statement of writeln in the constructor doesn't execute.
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.puremagic.com/pipermail/digitalmars-d/attachments/20130702/9cedbd7c/attachment.html>