UFCS and constructors

[Timon Gehr]

On 07/02/2013 09:35 AM, monarch_dodra wrote:
> ...
>
> One of the "big" problems with allowing UFCS and constructors is that a
> "." which meant "scope" can now mean "function call".
> ...

I missed this point.

'One of the drawbacks of UFCS is that "bar.foo" which meant "scope 
lookup" or "opDispatch instantiation" or "alias this lookup" can now 
also mean "UFCS lookup".'

Fixed.