D vs C++ - Where are the benchmarks?

[Joseph Rushton Wakeling]

On 07/03/2013 05:13 AM, Mehrdad wrote:
> That doesn't mean D is "faster". It just means it's less painful to get the same
> performance.

That would be ... kind of the point.  If we didn't care about the pain, we'd all
be programming using assembly.  Or butterflies: https://xkcd.com/378/

But faster performance with less pain and more safety?  Yes please. :-)