UFCS and constructors

[Timon Gehr]

On 07/03/2013 04:53 PM, John Colvin wrote:
> On Wednesday, 3 July 2013 at 03:22:16 UTC, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
>> That is _very_ broken IMHO. It makes no sense for parens to be
>> optional with
>> opCall. The whole point of opCall is to overload the parens!
>
> So much about optional parenthesis is broken. I really wish things
> weren't going that way, it obfusticates the difference between a
> callable and the result in a really nasty way, and it doesn't work for
> function pointers (nor does UFCS unfortunately).

Yes, UFCS works.