[:] as empty associative array literal, plus warning for null

Andrei Alexandrescu SeeWebsiteForEmail at erdani.org
Thu Jul 4 07:32:57 PDT 2013


On 7/4/13 3:00 AM, Dicebot wrote:
> I am afraid I don't really follow here. How introducing new array
> literal (and making old one stronger typed) compromises typeof(null)
> features?

If it has a different type, there's unneeded secession. If it has the 
same type, it's arguably useless as one could always write (T[K]).init 
in the rare cases that need disambiguation.

Andrei



More information about the Digitalmars-d mailing list