[:] as empty associative array literal, plus warning for null
SeeWebsiteForEmail at erdani.org
Thu Jul 4 16:25:38 PDT 2013
On 7/4/13 11:38 AM, bearophile wrote:
> Andrei Alexandrescu:
>> I also happen to think we don't quite need .
> It's the opposite, we don't need null to represent empty dynamic arrays.
> Hopefully Rust designers will avoid such point of views, they generally
> prefer a less sloppy design and a stronger typing.
Where does the whole "stronger typing" comes in? This is poppycock. We
need real arguments here.
More information about the Digitalmars-d