A thread without GC

[w0rp]

On Monday, 8 July 2013 at 14:16:46 UTC, John Colvin wrote:
> On Monday, 8 July 2013 at 14:11:16 UTC, w0rp wrote:
>>
>> We really need to implement a better GC. That's the very hard 
>> but better solution.
>
> We need to have a <b>choice</b> of GCs. There is no single 
> design that is right for every use case. Sometimes (admittedly 
> rather rarely) conservative stop-the-world is actually a good 
> thing!

Yes, this is true. Java offers a few options for tweaking the GC, 
so we could do the same.