Module visibility feature?
tommitissari at hotmail.com
Wed Jul 17 07:06:02 PDT 2013
On Wednesday, 17 July 2013 at 11:33:39 UTC, Jeremy DeHaan wrote:
> Has anything like this been suggested/thought of before? I
> looked through the DIP's but didn't see anything.
I don't know, but I think this is a good suggestion; stronger
language support for modules that are an implementation detail of
a package. The 'package' keyword you suggested is definitely more
logical than 'private'.
More information about the Digitalmars-d