David d at dav1d.de
Wed Jul 17 11:00:02 PDT 2013

Why doesn't GC.calloc follow the function signature of stdc.calloc?

calloc(num, size_per_element)

I think this should be changed, if no reason speaks against it, I can
look into changing this.
Of course this will break backwards compatability, but I think this is
worth it?

More information about the Digitalmars-d mailing list