Labels as values and threaded-code interpretation
Alex Rønne Petersen
alex at lycus.org
Sat Jun 1 19:33:08 PDT 2013
On 01-06-2013 11:43, bearophile wrote:
> Alex Rønne Petersen:
>
>> final switch (insn.op)
>> {
>> case imm: lbl = &&handle_imm; break;
>> case add: lbl = &&handle_add; break;
>> case sub: lbl = &&handle_sub; break;
>> // ...
>> case ret: lbl = &&handle_ret; break;
>
> Regarding the syntax, why do you use "&&"? Isn't a single "&" enough?
>
> case imm: lbl = &handle_imm; break;
>
> If such gotos become a natural part of the D syntax then it's not
> necessary to copy the GNU C syntax.
>
> Bye,
> bearophile
I just used the GNU C syntax because I was familiar with it. I don't
particularly care how it ends up looking in D. But Timon makes a good
point about namespaces.
--
Alex Rønne Petersen
alex at alexrp.com / alex at lycus.org
http://alexrp.com / http://lycus.org
More information about the Digitalmars-d
mailing list