The non allocating D subset
Piotr Szturmaj
bncrbme at jadamspam.pl
Sun Jun 2 07:50:57 PDT 2013
W dniu 01.06.2013 07:45, SomeDude pisze:
> Following this idea, I believe a fairly large chunk of Phobos could be
> ported to compile with this minimal D sublanguage, and that one could
> use the allocating D and its added sugar on top of it. So in the end,
> the user could decide between working with the non allocating language
> (mostly embedded programmers and game makers), or benefit from the GC
> and all the associated niceties (the rest of us).
When I started using D, I thought that it's done this ways.
> This would make D the truely universal language it was intended to be.
I'd love to see that! I think that Phobos code that makes allocations
can be divided (duplicated) to manual and GC versions.
More information about the Digitalmars-d
mailing list