Slow performance compared to C++, ideas?
Jonathan M Davis
jmdavisProg at gmx.com
Thu Jun 6 10:42:07 PDT 2013
On Wednesday, June 05, 2013 22:50:14 Michel Fortin wrote:
> P.S.: while implementing this change, please make sure private and
> package functions can be virtual.
I'd agree with package on that, but I don't think that private should be
virtualizable, because that conflicts with actually hiding non-accessible
functions, which is what a number of us are pushing for. Otherwise, private
implementation details of classes and modules risk causing code breakage (e.g.
the fact that overload resolution occurs before checking the access level is
atrocious).
- Jonathan M Davis
More information about the Digitalmars-d
mailing list