The cast(signed), cast(unsigned) feature proposal
Mrzlga
bulletproofchest at gmail.com
Fri Jun 7 17:43:26 PDT 2013
"doing nothing but converting unsigned->signed" is a dubious
statement.
They are still screwing with the range, they are not just "doing
nothing but converting unsigned->signed".
And 'int' says something about the outcome.
So I am really asking for:
cast(signed int) x; // make them poor programmers write this,
lol
That's not what I actually want, but at least it shows: We're
making a signed conversion, AND we're screwing with the range to
make it into an int.
for further thought.
More information about the Digitalmars-d
mailing list