Downgrading ranges
Peter Alexander
peter.alexander.au at gmail.com
Sun Jun 9 05:25:44 PDT 2013
On Sunday, 9 June 2013 at 12:19:47 UTC, Lars T. Kyllingstad wrote:
> A recent pull request discussion got me thinking: The ability
> to "downgrade" a range to a less featureful one -- wrapping a
> random access range in an input range, say -- can be very
> useful sometimes, particularly for testing.
"Particularly for testing", or *only* for testing? Is there any
other use? (I can't think of any non-contrived use case beyond
testing).
If it's just for testing, would it not be better to just supply a
variety of test ranges that implement all combinations of traits?
More information about the Digitalmars-d
mailing list