Slow performance compared to C++, ideas?

deadalnix deadalnix at gmail.com
Tue Jun 11 22:10:04 PDT 2013


On Wednesday, 12 June 2013 at 03:26:43 UTC, Daniel Murphy wrote:
> "Jonathan M Davis" <jmdavisProg at gmx.com> wrote in message
> news:mailman.894.1370540538.13711.digitalmars-d at puremagic.com...
>> On Wednesday, June 05, 2013 22:50:14 Michel Fortin wrote:
>>> P.S.: while implementing this change, please make sure 
>>> private and
>>> package functions can be virtual.
>>
>> I'd agree with package on that, but I don't think that private 
>> should be
>> virtualizable, because that conflicts with actually hiding 
>> non-accessible
>> functions, which is what a number of us are pushing for. 
>> Otherwise, private
>> implementation details of classes and modules risk causing 
>> code breakage (e.g.
>> the fact that overload resolution occurs before checking the 
>> access level is
>> atrocious).
>>
>> - Jonathan M Davis
>
> Private functions can be overridden only within the same 
> module.  This does
> not conflict with hiding private members from _outside_ the 
> module.  You
> will always be able to _see_ private members from inside the 
> same module,
> virtual or not.

Which also make them finalizable automagically.


More information about the Digitalmars-d mailing list