Ranges and random numbers -- again

Joseph Rushton Wakeling joseph.wakeling at webdrake.net
Mon Jun 17 16:16:24 PDT 2013


On 06/18/2013 12:10 AM, H. S. Teoh wrote:
> What were the reasons it was not accepted?

I think mostly that, as a patch to std.random, it was a breaking change.  There
was a proposal to make a std.random2 but that would have been a rather more
major piece of work :-(



More information about the Digitalmars-d mailing list