Feature request: Optional, simplified syntax for simple contracts
Aleksandar Ruzicic
aleksandar at ruzicic.info
Mon Jun 17 22:16:52 PDT 2013
On Sunday, 16 June 2013 at 00:19:37 UTC, Manu wrote:
> Super awesome idea! How about coma separated expressions to
> perform
> multiple asserts?
>
> int func(int i, int j) in(i<5, j<10)
> {
> return i + j;
> }
I find use of comma inside of parentheses of a statement a bit
unusual. Correct me if I'm wrong but I don't think there is a
single statement in D that separates it's "parts" with a comma.
It's always a semi-colon.
So I think it should be:
int func(int i, int j) in (i < 5; j < 10)
{
return i + j;
}
But either comma or a semi-colon used as a separator, this is a
really nice syntactic sugar!
More information about the Digitalmars-d
mailing list