virtual, package, private

deadalnix deadalnix at gmail.com
Tue Jun 18 00:57:22 PDT 2013


On Tuesday, 18 June 2013 at 07:27:50 UTC, Namespace wrote:
> I'm also for an explicit 'virtual' keyword.
> But I don't get why private methods should be virtual? That 
> makes never sense.

Because the unit of encapsulation in D is the module not the 
class.


More information about the Digitalmars-d mailing list