Undefined behaviors & Clang 3.3
eles
eles at eles.com
Fri Jun 21 06:48:17 PDT 2013
On Friday, 21 June 2013 at 10:42:32 UTC, bearophile wrote:
> qznc:
>
>> In D an integer overflow is defined, so there is no need to
>> detect anything about it.
>
> A language should offer the programmer a way to specify when an
> integral overflow is acceptable. Otherwise the other cases are
> bugs. Clang 3.3 helps find some of those bugs.
I just wanted to say almost the same thing: that the original
sentence should read:
"In D an integer overflow is *badly or, at least, questionably
and inflexibly* defined, so there is no *possibility* to detect
anything *useful* about it."
Well, that was the flame for today.
More information about the Digitalmars-d
mailing list