top time wasters in DMD, as reported by gprof

John Colvin john.loughran.colvin at gmail.com
Tue Jun 25 23:47:33 PDT 2013


On Monday, 24 June 2013 at 18:01:11 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
> On 6/24/2013 6:19 AM, dennis luehring wrote:
>> how does that look using msvc compiling the dmd compiler
>> as it turns out that msvc make dmd much faster
>
> The profile report was done by gcc/gprof.
>
> And besides, better compilers shouldn't change profile results.

I'm confused.... Different optimisers often produce radically 
different profile results. Or are am I misunderstanding you?


More information about the Digitalmars-d mailing list