top time wasters in DMD, as reported by gprof

[dennis luehring]

Am 26.06.2013 08:47, schrieb John Colvin:
> On Monday, 24 June 2013 at 18:01:11 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
>> On 6/24/2013 6:19 AM, dennis luehring wrote:
>>> how does that look using msvc compiling the dmd compiler
>>> as it turns out that msvc make dmd much faster
>>
>> The profile report was done by gcc/gprof.
>>
>> And besides, better compilers shouldn't change profile results.
>
> I'm confused.... Different optimisers often produce radically
> different profile results. Or are am I misunderstanding you?
>

maybe he talk about the dmd -release parameter but even that should 
produce different results (or is the same code use the same amount?)