Notes from C++ static analysis
Jonathan M Davis
jmdavisProg at gmx.com
Wed Jun 26 16:42:10 PDT 2013
On Wednesday, June 26, 2013 23:47:32 Paulo Pinto wrote:
> I have been an adept of iostreams since day one and never understood why
> people complain so much about them or the operator<< and operator>>
> for that matter.
I actually like them (particularly because I really don't like how primitive
printf is with regards to types), but they fail completely when it comes to
formatting, and you have to break up your strings too much. e.g.
cout << "[" << value1 << ", " << value2 << "]" << endl;
instead of
printf("[%d, %d]\n", value1, value2);
writefln fixes the typing problem that printf has in that it's not only type
safe, but it allows you to just use %s everywhere (and you don't have to use
c_str() on strings all over the place like with C++'s std::string), so I
definitely think that what we have with D is far better than either iostreams
or printf.
But with C++, which I use depends on my mood and the code, because both
iostreams and printf suck. They just suck differently. But I've never actually
minded that they used the shift operators for I/O beyond the fact that putting
a bunch of values in the middle of a string with iostreams breaks things up
too much (unlike with format strings).
- Jonathan M Davis
More information about the Digitalmars-d
mailing list