why allocators are not discussed here
Brian Rogoff
brogoff at gmail.com
Fri Jun 28 06:38:24 PDT 2013
On Friday, 28 June 2013 at 10:57:45 UTC, deadalnix wrote:
> On Thursday, 27 June 2013 at 22:50:47 UTC, John Colvin wrote:
>> Old but perhaps relevant?
>>
>> http://www.linkedin.com/news?viewArticle=&articleID=-1&gid=86782&type=member&item=253295471&articleURL=http%3A%2F%2Fwww%2Eallendowney%2Ecom%2Fss08%2Fhandouts%2Fberger02reconsidering%2Epdf&urlhash=96TJ&goback=%2Egmr_86782%2Egde_86782_member_253295471
>>
>> (It's an academic article about memory allocation from 2002)
>
> Interesting paper. Still concurrency isn't really addressed,
> which is a problem to be future proof.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hoard_memory_allocator
More information about the Digitalmars-d
mailing list