D vs C++ - Where are the benchmarks?

David d at dav1d.de
Sun Jun 30 15:35:45 PDT 2013


Am 30.06.2013 22:53, schrieb SomeDude:
> On Sunday, 30 June 2013 at 20:47:17 UTC, Adam D. Ruppe wrote:
>> On Sunday, 30 June 2013 at 20:37:16 UTC, SomeDude wrote:
>>> It seems indeed that the automatic memory management is a major
>>> performance killer
>>
>> Eh, I'd say it is D's gc implementation specifically that is the
>> biggest worry rather than the concept. I think the .net gc is
>> seriously like 10x faster than D's implementation.
> 
> Yes, yes, you're right. However, not allocating at least in Phobos is
> one of the surest way to get near optimal performance, not to mention
> it's always more satisfying when you know that your program doesn't
> monopolize Mb of RAM to do even the simplest task.

Wow, I don't care if it does, especially if it is only a simple task.
Memory is there to be used. If I want to avoid memory useage, I wouldn't
be using D.


More information about the Digitalmars-d mailing list