Migrating dmd to D?

[Iain Buclaw]

On 1 March 2013 10:43, Jacob Carlborg <doob at me.com> wrote:

> On 2013-03-01 11:29, Iain Buclaw wrote:
>
>  The code that interfaces with gcc needs to be in either C or C++.  There
>> are C++ structs/classes defined in the D frontend that while they
>> include all methods required for parsing/semantic analysis of D code.
>> They also include methods that are used to generate the codegen for the
>> backend (toElem, toIR, toSymbol, etc).  In gdc, these are gcc
>> interfacing methods that can't be converted to D.
>>
>
> Can you use the current toElem, toIR and toSymbol written in C++. Then
> port in changes from the version written in D as needed?
>
> --
> /Jacob Carlborg
>


Also, what changes dmd makes to it's back-end facing functions do not
necessarily affect gdc.  So there has never really been a direct conversion
from one to the other, however as they (should) do effectively the same
code generation, one can draw comparisons between them.

Regards,
-- 
Iain Buclaw

*(p < e ? p++ : p) = (c & 0x0f) + '0';
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.puremagic.com/pipermail/digitalmars-d/attachments/20130301/208ad559/attachment.html>