Slower than Python

Jacob Carlborg doob at me.com
Sun Mar 3 07:09:57 PST 2013


On 2013-03-02 17:48, John Colvin wrote:

> It does.
>
> Failing to beat mature, optimised C is not anything to be ashamed of,
> but being slower than python would be an abject failure of D as a
> compiled, systems programming language.

Then D needs to get faster, or we need to switch to C for some std lib 
functions. In that case, as Walter said, we have failed.

-- 
/Jacob Carlborg


More information about the Digitalmars-d mailing list