Is there something like anonymous struct?

[eGust]

On Tuesday, 5 March 2013 at 16:02:50 UTC, Steven Schveighoffer 
wrote:
> On Mon, 04 Mar 2013 21:58:57 -0500, eGust <egustc at gmail.com> 
> wrote:
>
>> On Tuesday, 5 March 2013 at 02:15:33 UTC, anonymous wrote:
>>> On Tuesday, 5 March 2013 at 02:01:47 UTC, eGust wrote:
>>>> Can I write something like this:
>>>>
>>>> __gshared immutable foo = {
>>>> auto
>>>> 	func1	= &fn1,
>>>> 	func2	= &fn2,
>>>> ...
>>>> }
>>>>
>>>> Or just
>>>>
>>>> ... = {
>>>> &fn1, &fn2, ...
>>>> }
>>>
>>> import std.typecons: tuple;
>>> __gshared immutable foo = tuple(&fn1, &fn2, ...);
>>
>> Yes, it looks better. Can tuple guarantee the order and 
>> alignment of the elements? I need an interface with other 
>> languages.
>
> It will be equivalent to a struct declared with those members.
>
> However, I would say if you are looking for a type to push 
> across languages, why not declare the type?
>
> -Steve
Thank you all guys. I'll use tuple. This way will make it faster 
and easier.

If QtD can be built with 2.062, I would do all my work in D. Now 
I'm using CPP which is I'd never used before. It already bothers 
me. Now I'm writing C-style CPP for GUI and D for all the others 
in the same time, so I must try to reduce the number of the 
interface functions. That's why I don't wanna waste my time on 
repeating the same declarations, especially it's a trouble if I 
make any change.
Because it's easy to output the type of var in D, I think I can 
make them declared in the end. :)