Migrating dmd to D?

Kagamin spam at here.lot
Thu Mar 7 06:55:17 PST 2013


On Wednesday, 6 March 2013 at 00:25:30 UTC, Adam Wilson wrote:
> My preference would be to completely replace the back-end with 
> LLVM. Why LLVM? Well as opposed to GCC it was designed from the 
> ground up to support many languages.

I heard, llvm was written for C and x86. C++, exceptions and ARM 
pushed it beyond its limits and created a lot of kludge and 
redesigns.


More information about the Digitalmars-d mailing list