Release process and backwards compatibility

[Jonathan M Davis]

On Saturday, March 09, 2013 04:38:08 Rikki Cattermole wrote:
> Personally I think we need to consider D3 as breaking. We can
> leave out any major changes till then or at least that would be
> nice. That way we can use D2 for LTS once we begin on D3.
> How ever this will bring back e.g. the old python 2.x vs 3.x
> divide which would be a shame. But at the same time it'll mean we
> can do some big stuff that would just not be acceptable in
> breaking old projects.

D3 will not be happening any time soon. D2 will have to have been stable and 
around for a while before we plan to even consider it.

- Jonathan M Davis