Any takers for http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=9673?

[Vladimir Panteleev]

On Sunday, 10 March 2013 at 15:38:42 UTC, deadalnix wrote:
> It really depend on the coding style. If you do some C-like D, 
> everything is fine, but if you use complex feature of D, then 
> incremental compilation become clearly impossible (I spent a 
> fair amount of time on the problem).

I think this is a serious problem. I hadn't thought of it before, 
but if we are designing our tools to work around implementation 
issues in the compiler, I think we're doing something wrong. 
Rather than meddling with a crippled incremental compilation 
model for rdmd that'll get obsoleted by a fixed compiler, how 
about attacking the problem directly?

It doesn't help that the problems surrounding incremental 
compilation (I mean the general case with incrementally compiling 
a few modules at once, not deadalnix's bug) don't seem to be 
well-defined. Do we have a filed issue with a reproducible test 
case?