The new std.process is ready for review

Lars T. Kyllingstad public at kyllingen.net
Tue Mar 12 14:23:05 PDT 2013


On Tuesday, 12 March 2013 at 15:07:09 UTC, Vladimir Panteleev 
wrote:
> On Tuesday, 12 March 2013 at 15:02:46 UTC, Vladimir Panteleev 
> wrote:
>> we could implement
>
> (I use the word "we" very liberally in this thread)

Nah, implementing it is easy.  Getting the API right is the hard 
part.  So "we" is perfectly OK. :)

Lars


More information about the Digitalmars-d mailing list