C++ guys hate static_if?
Nick Sabalausky
SeeWebsiteToContactMe at semitwist.com
Thu Mar 14 10:59:25 PDT 2013
On Thu, 14 Mar 2013 13:50:33 -0400
Andrei Alexandrescu <SeeWebsiteForEmail at erdani.org> wrote:
> On 3/14/13 1:43 PM, Nick Sabalausky wrote:
> > On Thu, 14 Mar 2013 11:38:52 -0400
> > Andrei Alexandrescu<SeeWebsiteForEmail at erdani.org> wrote:
> >
> >> On 3/14/13 11:05 AM, monarch_dodra wrote:
> >>> Having to instantiate a template just to check to make sure it is
> >>> semantically correct is a huge pain.
> >>
> >> I'm not sure about that. The way I see it, no code should be not
> >> delivered without being unittested. Ubiquitous unittesting is now
> >> mainstream. The way I see it, a type system on top of templates
> >> would only help people who don't write unittests.
> >>
> >
> > What the hell is this, a JS/Python forum all of a sudden? You're
> > literally making the exact same argument as "We don't need no
> > steenkin' static type checking."
>
> No.
>
Yes.
More information about the Digitalmars-d
mailing list